Delta Interventions Studio 2016-2017 (first round of graduations July 2017)
San Francisco Bay – Resilience by Design.
Designing for uncertain delta-landscape futures.
Joint Design Studio
TU Delft / UC Berkeley College of Environmental Design
Supported by DIMI Delft Deltas, Infrastructure & Mobility Initiative
Advanced Urban Design Studio
Responsible Instructor/ Coordinator
prof.dr.ir. Peter Bosselmann
Responsible Instructor/ Coordinator
dr.ir. Taneha Kuzniecow Bacchin, t.bacchin (at) tudelft.nl
prof.dr.ir. Han Meyer (emeritus)
prof.ir. Frits Palmboom (emeritus)
Architecture & Urbanism
dr.ir. Taneha Kuzniecow Bacchin
ir. Stefan de Koning
dr. Fransje Hooimeijer
dr. Diego Carmona Sepulveda
ir. Kristel Aalbers
dr.ir. Inge Bobbink
ir. Sjap Holst
ir. Filippo laFleur
Architecture & Public Building
Hydraulic Structures & Flood Risk
Delta Interventions (D-i) is an interdisciplinary graduation studio (architecture, urbanism, landscape architecture, hydraulic structures/ flood risk, water management, policy analysis) focusing on the transformations of delta landscapes – the dynamic relation between natural processes and societal practices in both opportunities and threats for future urbanisation. D-i has a strong emphasis on the agency of spatial interventions in the production of territories. The studio investigates the possibilities to combine flood protection and water management strategies with urban design, landscape design and spatial planning, aiming at improving spatial forms and structures in urban and metropolitan delta regions. Part of Delta Urbanism Interdisciplinary Research Group, the studio develops design and planning approaches and methods which contribute to make urban delta landscapes more sustainable, attractive and adaptive.
For the academic year 2016-2017 the focus of the studio will be the assignment provided by the ‘Bay Area Resilience by Design Challenge’ launched in April 2016 by Chief Resiliency Officers from San Francisco, Oakland, and Berkeley, Bay Conservation and Development Commission, Association of Bay Area Governments, Bay Area Regional Collaborative, San Francisco Estuary Institute, SPUR, the Climate Readiness Institute, and the California Coastal Conservancy. Inspired by ‘New York’s Rebuild by Design’ the design competition aims at addressing challenges affecting the resiliency of San Francisco Bay Area neighbourhoods, environment, and infrastructure in an era of climate uncertainty. In collaboration with the University of California, Berkeley, College of Environmental Design, Delta Interventions Studio seeks to develop innovative projects to increase Bay Area’s adaptive capacity and local area performance in response to future uncertainty in climate and urbanisation patterns.
Within this scope of the delta, students are free to follow their fascination and choose their own assignment (design, engineering, policy and management) which can vary from buildings, constructions and public works to urban areas, landscapes and regions.
Bjorn Marsman/ Dinah Carolina Pastor/ Felix Ahuis/ Gijs Beckman/ Lujia Xu/ Sacha Noorlander/
Tijs Niessen/ Zhuting Li/ Mehran Samiyi/ Licheng Wang
Supriya Krishnan/ Sergio Abraham Berumen/ Milburn Sumanth Subbarao/ Pim Monsma/ Seul Lee/
Sahil Ajay/ Kanekar Rahul Dewan/ Max Suijkerbuijk/ Jeroen van der Kwaak/ Lisanne Viergeves/
Menghan Zheng/ Peter Steehouder
Leyang Chen/ Menghan Fu/ Jiayan Tan
Technology, Policy & Management (elective course)
Water Management (elective course)
Geert van der Meulen
Joint Design Studio Concept
Text by Prof. Peter Bosselmann
College of Environmental Design/ University of California at Berkeley/ Master Program in the Design of Urban Places/ Urban Places Advanced Studio
San Francisco Bay is a tidal estuary of the Pacific Ocean connected to the inland delta of the Sacramento and San Joachim Rivers. The landform in which the Bay resides has a roughly 500,000 year history. Here estuaries existed 7 times, each time during interglacial periods. In its current form the Bay existed for approximately 8.000 years. Tidal estuaries form a water to land transition zone. By the mid 1800’s the Bay had formed an estuarine to terrestrial transition zone of over 250,000 acres or 110,000 ha. This large area is referred to as the baylands. Prior to urbanisation this transition zone was primarily made up of tidal marshes and tidal mud flats. The use of the baylands changed greatly in the 200 years of urbanisation. Approximately 50.000 acres of reclaimed land were added. In the year 2000 only 60,000 acres of tidal marshes and tidal flats remained. The baylands in their changed condition still exist at roughly at the same low elevations. It is this transition zone that is most precious as society confronts sea level rise. Here design decisions have to be made. Some designs include tidal marsh restoration that also protects upland conditions from sea level rise. These restorations are referred to as soft edge solutions. Approximately 9,000 acres of restored tidal marshes have been added since 1999. In other areas decisions still have to be made with a current emphasis on restoring the transition zone. That leaves around 84,000 acres where urbanisation has occupied lands close to the water’s edge and where hard edge solutions will be necessary. For the landscape ecologist these 84,000 acres are degraded ecosystems or patches. For an urban designer the design of such patches needs to include human activities, sometimes intensely human, allowing people, sometimes in great numbers, access right up to the water’s edge. It is the design of such places that is most challenging. Residing in proximity to water, overlooking water, stepping down to water, sensing water on approach to the shoreline—these are profoundly human experiences that sustain human life in cities; especially the life of those who live in cities near water. The dichotomy implied in these words between designing in support of natural processes and designing for human needs and values will be reflected in our studio work.
The discussion about the design of the transition zone between water and land has been discussed since 1965, when the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission was established. A more current discussion about the future of the transition zone is only in the beginning stages as the sciences about the consequences of climate change have become better known. The design of the transition zone requires a balance between engineering solutions that protect the functions of communities, and the repair or reconstruction of ecological systems. Cities around San Francisco Bay are discussing adaptation strategies with built-in redundancies. Such strategies introduce multiple and overlapping designs to create redundancy in the defense against flooding. Wherever available space permits, redundancy is preferred over a single line of defense. Redundancy increases safety in the long run.
The danger is that the maps showing projected inundations of the transition zone by some date in the distant or not so distant future will scare society into making major mistakes that would have otherwise never been considered. I would consider it a mistake, if for example infrastructure funding to improve bridges and highways would make large coastal engineering protection measures feasible without examining more benign interventions. A moveable barrier at the Golden Gate between San Francisco and Marin County would be such a mistake. Mistakes will be made; an approach to design is necessary that is incremental and allows us to repair mistakes. Much more frequently than in the past, the context of climate change forces designers to ask, how do we repair our designs, if they fail?
To start our work we will travel to different locations around San Francisco Bay. We will draw a transect over the baylands to select locations that are representative of the transition zone between land and water. From such a survey we will select 10 sites that will potentially become the sites for the actual 2017 competition. Individually, or in small groups we will produce “tentative designs”. I have borrowed the term tentative design from Giancarlo di Carlo, the Italian architect and educator who coined the term to clarify that spatial design is like any other form of decision making effort. To approach a decision in the context of many interrelated variables a designer works on spatial solutions to test the implications of decisions made. Such a process can only be tentative at first, done by a designer who keeps an open mind about initial solutions and understands that revisions and changes will become necessary.